Albanese Rejects Opposition Question Linking Palestine Policy to US Ties

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has dismissed opposition claims that Australia’s recognition of Palestinian statehood could strain ties with the United States, describing the suggestion as “flippant” and “unworthy.”

During Question Time, Manager of Opposition Business Alex Hawke pressed the Prime Minister on whether the recognition decision might hinder his ability to secure a meeting with US President Donald Trump. Hawke also challenged him to “table the 5,324 times” he had previously been asked about a Trump meeting, referencing Albanese’s earlier comments at a press conference.

At the press event, Albanese had responded to repeated questions about the prospect of a Trump meeting by directing journalists to his past answers. That remark resurfaced during the parliamentary exchange.

Defending the government’s position, Albanese said recognition of Palestine was aimed at supporting “ordinary people of the West Bank and Gaza.” He argued that the opposition’s questions diminished both Middle East diplomacy and Australia’s alliance with Washington.

“The fact that the manager of opposition business asked such a flippant question about the relationship between Australia and the US, or about Middle East peace, shows how unworthy they are, those opposite,” Albanese told Parliament.

The Prime Minister stressed that his government continues to engage constructively with the United States and that Canberra’s foreign policy is shaped by principles rather than partisan debate.

The exchange came as the Senate began its sitting week with a separate dispute, described by observers as a “mean girls” scuffle, which briefly diverted attention from the main foreign policy debate.

Australia’s recognition of Palestinian statehood has become a divisive issue in domestic politics. Critics argue the timing risks diplomatic fallout, while supporters maintain it reflects backing for a two-state solution.

Despite opposition pressure, Albanese said Australia’s partnership with the United States remains strong. He pointed to ongoing cooperation on security, trade, and regional stability.

The debate underscored sharp differences between the government and the opposition over foreign policy and how it intersects with domestic politics. Further questions are expected in Parliament this week on both international relations and national priorities.